<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Runoff Area</title>
	<atom:link href="http://runoffarea.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://runoffarea.co.uk</link>
	<description>More Accurate Than Planet-F1!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:57:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>F1 teams in solidarity with football fans</title>
		<link>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/f1-teams-in-solidarity-with-football-fans/</link>
		<comments>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/f1-teams-in-solidarity-with-football-fans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Red Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Also In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F1 Teams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-F1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runoffarea.co.uk/?p=1161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an astonishing display of unity, FOTA have unanimously declared support for football fans wishing to have the vuvuzela banned in the FIFA World Cup.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="Vuvuzela" src="http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/6/10/1276190910492/South-African-boys-blow-t-006.jpg" alt="" width="276" height="166" /></p>
<p>The Formula One Teams&#8217; Association have declared that they agree with football fans who wish to see the vuvuzela banned for crowds watching World Cup games in South Africa.</p>
<p>The controversial horn-like devices have attracted complaints from fans, players and officials alike, who see them as an annoyance and a distraction.</p>
<p>&#8220;Having watched a few World Cup games on TV, we agree that the vuvuzela should be banned forthwith,&#8221; FOTA President Martin Whitmarsh said. &#8220;It defies belief that these professional sportspeople are expected to do their jobs in the face of such a massive distraction from the noise generated by these devices.&#8221;</p>
<p>The rest of Whitmarsh&#8217;s comments were drowned out by the sound of 24 passing V8 engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/f1-teams-in-solidarity-with-football-fans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall blamed for Massa damage</title>
		<link>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/wall-blamed-for-massa-damage/</link>
		<comments>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/wall-blamed-for-massa-damage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Red Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[F1 Circuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runoffarea.co.uk/?p=1158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Canadian GP stewards have penalised one of the walls at the edge of the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve for damaging Felipe Massa's front wing during yesterday's race.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Montreal, Monday</em>: In a late announcement from the stewards of the Canadian Grand Prix, it has emerged that the wall immediately prior to the pit entrance on the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve has been reprimanded and fined $10,000 for causing an avoidable incident with Michael Schumacher and Felipe Massa.</p>
<p>The Mercedes and Ferrari drivers were fighting over ninth place at the end of yesterday&#8217;s Grand Prix, when Massa suffered front wing damage after being squeezed into the wall while attempting an overtaking move. The Ferrari driver dropped to fifteenth position and was subsequently penalised for speeding in the pit lane while attempting to change his nose.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><img title="Massa" src="http://cdn.gallery.autosport.com/picture_free.php/dir/2010can4/image/su_10cdn1462-2" alt="" width="400" height="267" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Broken: Massa&#39;s nose after the wall&#39;s vicious assault</p></div>
<p>&#8220;Having reviewed the incident between cars 3 and 7 toward the end of the race, the Stewards have decided that the wall into which car 7 was pushed was in a dangerous position and should have taken appropriate action to avoid the collision,&#8221; the announcement read. &#8220;The Stewards have therefore resolved to fine the wall USD 10,000 and issue an official warning that if such behaviour is repeated, the wall will be reminded very sternly that such behaviour should not be repeated.</p>
<p>&#8220;Moreover, the Stewards have declined to take action on car 3 for the incident, as the driver of car 3 should have expected a more mature and professional response from the wall in question. The Stewards hold the wall one hundred per cent responsible for the damage caused to car 7.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ferrari have already lashed out at the decision, with President Luca di Montezemolo particularly outraged. &#8220;These new walls are just incompetent and dangerous compared to the old, established walls that we are used to,&#8221; Montezemolo whispered, hoarsely. &#8220;Perhaps the better teams such as ourselves should be charged with providing extra walls for safer racing, taking the responsibility away from the dangerous mavericks that caused this problem.&#8221;</p>
<p>In a separate incident, the stewards also ordered that a strip of grass elsewhere on the circuit be dug up and moved a few metres further back on the track, as a penalty for damaging one of Schumacher&#8217;s tyres earlier in the race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/wall-blamed-for-massa-damage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC outline new F1 strategy</title>
		<link>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/bbc-outline-new-f1-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/bbc-outline-new-f1-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Red Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Also In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F1 Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runoffarea.co.uk/?p=1147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BBC have revealed their new approach to their coverage of F1 after they failed to win a BAFTA for their programme, borrowing several elements from ITV's approach to the sport to secure the support of the British Academy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="BBC" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2441/3648402330_47a79475a0.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="300" /></p>
<p>The BBC have revealed their new approach to their coverage of Formula One after the broadcaster failed to win a BAFTA for their programme covering the 2009 Brazilian Grand Prix, borrowing several elements from ITV&#8217;s award-winning approach to the sport to secure the support of the British Academy.</p>
<p>Revisions to the BBC&#8217;s F1 show, scheduled to fall into place in time for the 2011 season, include devoting 30 minutes of airtime each weekend to examining the contents of Lewis Hamilton&#8217;s bathroom cabinet, replacing post-race press conference footage with poorly scripted soap operas, and trading in Jonathan Legard for a tape recording of a befuddled man-child shouting &#8220;GET IN THERE!&#8221; at uncomfortably frequent intervals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/bbc-outline-new-f1-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New look, and other updates</title>
		<link>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/new-look-and-other-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/new-look-and-other-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 15:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Red Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runoffarea.co.uk/?p=1143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Red Andy pontificates tediously on the new look and feel of The Runoff Area.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://runoffarea.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/runoff-logo.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-543 alignleft" style="margin-right: 6px;" title="runoff-logo.jpg" src="http://runoffarea.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/runoff-logo.jpg" alt="" width="157" height="157" /></a>Yes, we&#8217;ve been through almost as many liveries as Jordan Grand Prix, but hopefully this one will be worth sticking with for the long term.</p>
<p>The new look forms part of our intent to expand the scope of The Runoff Area slightly. The viewership figures for the site have been steadily increasing in recent months, so it makes sense to offer more to keep readers coming back. The main focus of the site will continue to be the satirical news stories that have proven so popular over the last couple of years, now accessed from the front page under the heading &#8220;Top Stories.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, there are a few new features to draw your attention to as well. The new &#8220;Features&#8221; section will include a wider range of subjects than has traditionally been covered at The Runoff Area. In keeping with our heroes on other motorsport sites, our Features will cover a spectrum of topics from expert news analysis to meaningless speculation over Adrian Sutil&#8217;s sexuality.</p>
<p>&#8220;Also In The News&#8221; is another item you&#8217;ll spot on the front page, which is a place for shorter items &#8211; those that are based on photos, or for whatever reason undeserving of inclusion as a Top Story. In particular we&#8217;re encouraging readers to get in touch with their own ideas for pieces for this section: if you&#8217;ve got ideas for submissions, the <a href="http://www.runoffarea.co.uk/about/contact">Contact</a> page is the place to go.</p>
<p>Finally (for now at least), we&#8217;ve been given the opportunity to do a monthly poll of readers&#8217; opinions, based on the traditional structure of the Formula One Teams&#8217; Association, who seek to gauge F1 fans&#8217; views by their annual surveys. This month&#8217;s poll, in association with FOTA and Red Bull Racing, can be found on the front page.</p>
<p>More new features and, as ever, unique F1 satire will be forthcoming in the next few months. Thanks for all your support!</p>
<p><strong>Red Andy</strong><br />
Head of Dubious Aerodynamics, The Runoff Area</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/new-look-and-other-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silverstone developments hit trouble</title>
		<link>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/silverstone-developments-hit-trouble/</link>
		<comments>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/silverstone-developments-hit-trouble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Red Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[F1 Circuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runoffarea.co.uk/?p=1136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Progress at the Silverstone circuit has stalled after developers realised the new pit and paddock complex was being built in the wrong place.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Silverstone, Friday</em>: Redevelopments at the Silverstone circuit have run into trouble in recent days, after the British Racing Drivers&#8217; Club realised that their new pit and paddock complex was being built in the wrong place.</p>
<p>The new facility, set to open in 2011, was set to be constructed in the area around Bridge corner, before someone at the circuit pointed out that this part of the track is to be bypassed by most international events since the opening of the new &#8220;Arena circuit&#8221; layout earlier this year.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 285px"><img title="Silverstone" src="http://cdn.images.autosport.com/editorial/1275563459.jpg" alt="" width="275" height="183" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Wrong: New developments at Silverstone</p></div>
<p>Progress on the new complex is already going well, with foundations being laid and the pit wall having already been completed. The realisation that all of this is in the wrong place is sure to be a blow to Silverstone&#8217;s ambitions.</p>
<p>It has not yet been explained how such a catastrophic error could have happened, though the BRDC lounge&#8217;s traditional cocktail (a measure of gin combined with a tenuous grasp of reality) may have played its part in the debacle.</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, bugger,&#8221; said BRDC President Damon Hill when informed of the news. &#8220;Clearly we will have to begin rectifying this issue right away. I fully intend to spend the next ten years drawing up spurious plans for how this problem will be solved.&#8221;</p>
<p>In other news, there was cause for slight celebration at Silverstone after the Northamptonshire circuit installed its first flushing toilet. Plans are already underway to connect the track&#8217;s buildings to the National Grid, the BRDC having acknowledged that the previous method of self-generated power was not cost-effective. &#8220;Oiling the hamster&#8217;s wheel every day was a time-consuming and costly activity,&#8221; Hill revealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://runoffarea.co.uk/2010/06/silverstone-developments-hit-trouble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
